The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MEINERT MEYER, KLAUS KUPPERS, MANFRED ALBEDYHL
and BRUNO BOHMER
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0764
Application No. 09/660,797
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WALTZ, TIMM, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 and 8 through 10, which are the only
claims remaining in this application. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to a method
of cooling a steel section from rolling heat, where the section has
different section parts of different masses located at a distance
from each other over a cross-section of the section (Brief, page
3). The method comprises subjecting the steel section with the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007