Appeal No. 2003-0780
Application No. 08/642,962
After a careful assessment of a) the teachings to be derived
from LYSOL, b) the declarations submitted by Mr. Lloyd Luthringer
and Mr. Kirk Brewer (Paper Nos. 20 and 21), and c) the arguments
presented by appellant in the brief and reply brief (Paper Nos.
23 and 25), we find ourselves in agreement with appellant's
position that the methods of claims 1 through 11 on appeal would
not have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the
time of appellant's invention based on the teachings of LYSOL,
and, therefore, refuse to sustain the § 103 rejection on appeal.
66
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007