The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 64
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD B. WRIGHT
__________
Appeal No. 2003-0786
Application 09/059,712
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 24 through 35, 37, 42 through 44, 46, 48, 50,
52 and 54, which are the only claims remaining in this
application. Claims 1 through 23, 36, 38 through 41, 45, 47, 49,
51, 53 and 55 have been canceled.1
1 Decided concurrently herewith is the appeal in appellant’s
co-pending Application No. 09/282865, filed March 31, 1999
(Appeal No. 2003-1352). Given the close nature of the subject
(continued...)
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007