Ex Parte Wheeler et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                               Paper No. 15           

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte IAN A. WHEELER                                
                                         and                                          
                                    DEAN WICKWIRE                                     
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-0820                                  
                             Application No. 09/789,989                               
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before PAK, DELMENDO, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                  
          (2002) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 4            
          (final Office action mailed Oct. 1, 2001), which are all of the             
          claims pending in the above-identified application.                         
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a process for                  
          preparing water-blown polyurethane foam using a gaseous co-                 







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007