Ex Parte Samain et al - Page 6


                 Appeal No. 2003-0845                                                      Page 6                   
                 Application No. 09/689,818                                                                         

                 approximately 0.5% by weight of the final composition, based on the inclusion of                   
                 100g of water and only 0.5 g of the copolymer emulsion in the final composition.                   
                 Example 4 appears to have the largest concentration by weight, as it contains 2g                   
                 of copolymer, but also contains 100g of water in the final composition.  So, at                    
                 most, not considering the additional components of the final composition, the                      
                 copolymer would be present in a concentration of 2% by weight, well below the                      
                 10% or 15% required by the instant claims.                                                         
                       The rejection also looks to Hatfield to teach the selected concentration, as                 
                 well as the particular polymers required by the dependent claims.  See                             
                 Examiner’s Answer, page 5.  Hatfield teaches that:                                                 
                              When the polymer compositions of the present invention are                            
                       used in hairspray compositions, the concentration of copolymer in                            
                       the hairspray composition is typically from about 1 to 25 weight                             
                       percent, preferably from about 2 to 18 weight percent and more                               
                       preferably from about 3 to 15 weight percent of the hairspray                                
                       composition.                                                                                 
                 Id. at 5, lines 11-14.                                                                             
                       The examiner relies on examples 38-46 of Hatfield to support the                             
                 proposition that one would have been motivated to modify the polymer                               
                 concentration of Dubeif to arrive at the claimed polymer concentration.  Upon                      
                 review of the examples relied upon by the examiner, it is unclear what the                         
                 concentration of copolymer is used in Example 38, but examples 39-42 state                         
                 that:                                                                                              
                              The polymer composition of Example 9 was formulated in                                
                       accordance with the procedure of Example 38 to provide hair                                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007