Ex Parte LUNDSTEDT - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2003-0850                                                                                      
              Application No. 09/334,366                                                                                


                     1 .    A composite dispersing agent comprising an alkyl polyglycoside and                          
                     a polymeric anionic dispersant.                                                                    
                     21.  The product of the process which comprises forming a blend by                                 
                     mixing solutions of an alkyl polyglycoside and a polymeric anionic                                 
                     dispersant and drying the blend.                                                                   
              The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                           
              Moorer et al. (Moorer)            3,986,979                           Oct.  19, 1976                      
              Garst (Garst ‘115)                5,550,115                           Aug. 27, 1996                       
              Garst (Garst ‘078)                5,559,078                           Sep. 24, 1996                       
              Pilato et al. (Pilato)            5,883,112                           Mar. 16, 1999                       
                                                                             (filed Jul.  02, 1998)                     
                                                Grounds of Rejection                                                    
                     1.  Claims 1, 4, 5, 7-9, 13, 16, 17, 19 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                      
              § 102(b) as anticipated by Garst ‘078.                                                                    
                     We reverse.                                                                                        
                     2.  Claims 2, 3, 6, 10-12, 14, 15 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                   
              unpatentable over Garst ‘078 in view of Pilato and Garst ‘115.                                            
                     We reverse.                                                                                        
                     3.  Claims 21-28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                        
              over Garst ‘078, in view of Pilato and Garst ‘115 and further in view of Moorer.                          
                     We affirm.                                                                                         



                                                           2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007