Appeal No. 2003-0862
Application No. 09/518,032
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Murray is
affirmed. The rejection of claims 1-7 and 9-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious
over Dowell is affirmed. The rejection of claims 1-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
obvious over Murray in combination with Dowell is affirmed. The rejection of claims 1-
12 for obviousness-type double patenting over claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No.
6,048,519 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
)
SHERMAN D. WINTERS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
TONI R. SCHEINER )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
DEMETRA J. MILLS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007