The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BALAKRISHNAN SRINIVASA, MAHAJAN S. SHIVRAM, CHAPHEKAR G. MORESHWAR, GUPTE M. YESHWANT, KULKARNI M. PARSHURAM and BANDARUPALLI R. MURTHY ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0870 Application No. 09/046,740 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, PAK, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2-7 and 9-11 which are all of the claims remaining in the application. The subject matter on appeal relates to a process for preparing thiourea from calcium cyanamide, carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide reagents via specifically claimed steps and parameters. This appealed subject matter is adequately illustrated by independent claim 7 and independent claim 9, a copy of which taken from the appellants’ Brief is appended to this decision.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007