Appeal No. 03-0877 Page 8 Application No. 09/601,884 Parikh has been combined with Lachmann to reject dependent claim 6. Lachmann does not overcome the aforementioned problems with Parikh, and this rejection also is not sustained. We reach the same conclusion, for the same reason, with regard to dependent claim 11, where Healey has been combined with Parikh. CONCLUSION None of the rejections is sustained. The decision of the examiner is reversed. NEAL E. ABRAMS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JENNIFER D. BAHR ) Administrative Patent Judge ) NEA/lbgPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007