The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 39 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte KAI BOEGE, MICHAEL DZIALLAS, KLAUS HELPENSTEIN, WOLFGANG KLAUCK, JOHANN KLEIN, HELMUT LOTH, HARTMUT URBATH and UDO WINDHOEVEL ______________ Appeal No. 2003-0891 Application 09/011,614 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before WARREN, DELMENDO and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. Decision on Appeal This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 11, 12 and 14 through 34, which are all of the claims in the applications. Claim 11, as it stands of record,1 is illustrative of the claims on appeal: 11. An aqueous dispersion, liquid or spreadable at 20°C, and useful as a binder, sealing or coating composition, consisting essentially of water, a homopolymer or copolymer of styrene, a fatty compound, wherein a ratio by weight of the styrene polymer or styrene copolymer to fatty compound is from 100:0.5 to 100:15 wherein said fatty compound comprises at least one member selected from the group consisting of fatty acids, fatty alcohols, and derivatives thereof, wherein the fatty acids and fatty alcohols contain an aliphatic group having more than 12 carbon 1 See the amendment of October 10, 2001 (Paper No. 25), and the examiner’s answer (page 3). - 1 -Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007