Ex Parte Boesten et al - Page 4



              Appeal No. 2003-0897                                                               Page 4                
              Application No. 09/640,796                                                                               




















                                                    The Rejection                                                      
                     In rejecting the appealed claims, the examiner does not rely on any prior art                     
              references.  Claims 1 through 5 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                       
              paragraph, as based on a specification, as filed, which does not provide adequate,                       
              written descriptive support for the invention now claimed.                                               


                                                    Deliberations                                                      
                     Our deliberations in this matter have included evaluation and review of the                       
              following materials: (1) the instant specification, including Figures 1, 2, and 3, and all of            
              the claims on appeal; (2) applicants' Appeal Brief (Paper No. 17); and (3) the                           
              Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 18).                                                                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007