Ex Parte INOUE et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2003-0946                                                                               
             Application No. 08/904,137                                                                         

                                                BACKGROUND                                                      
                   The invention is directed to an integrated circuit (IC) card, and methods for                
             enhancing security in the addition, or changing, of programs on the card.                          
             Representative claim 75 is reproduced below.1                                                      
                   75.    A writing method for an IC card having a microprocessor, a ROM device                 
                   which stores a first program which is executed by said microprocessor, a write               
                   control program having a decryption function, and a writable memory, said                    
                   writing method comprising:                                                                   
                          inputting an encrypted second program, which has been encrypted based                 
                   on an encryption key, from an external device;                                               
                          decrypting said encrypted second program according to said write control              
                   program; and                                                                                 
                          storing a decrypted second program in said writable memory according to               
                   said write control program, said decrypted second program being executable by                
                   said microprocessor.                                                                         
                   The examiner relies on the following reference:                                              
             Hirokawa et al. (Hirokawa)                    4,827,512                 May 2, 1989                
                   Claims 20-38, 51-58, 71-87, 93, and 94 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as               
             being anticipated by Hirokawa.                                                                     
                   We refer to the Examiner’s Answer (Paper No. 40) for a statement of the                      
             examiner’s position and to the Brief (Paper No. 39) and the Reply Brief (Paper No. 42)             
             for appellants’ position with respect to the claims which stand rejected.                          


                   1 We note that the amendment filed August 19, 2002 (Paper No. 38) has not been formally      
             entered in the file wrapper.                                                                       
                                                      -2-                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007