The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 11 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte BRIAN ANDREW CROTTY, CRAIG STEPHEN SLAVTCHEFF and MICHAEL CHARLES CHENEY __________ Appeal No. 2003-0947 Application No. 09/854,372 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before SCHEINER, GRIMES and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-6, all the claims pending in the application. Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal: 1. A cosmetic cream cleanser composition comprising: (i) from about 0.1 to about 20% by weight of a silicate; (ii) from about 0.001 to about 2% by weight of a crosslinked carboxyvinyl polymer other than a long chain C10-C30 alkyl acrylate or methacrylate containing polymer; (iii) from about 0.01 to about 40% by weight of a silicone copolyol sulfosuccinate; and (iv) a cosmetically acceptable carrier; wherein the composition has a viscosity ranging from about 20,000 to about 500,000 cp. The references relied on by the examiner are:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007