The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 31 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JEAN-LOUIS GUERET __________ Appeal No. 2003-0984 Application No. 09/418,825 __________ HEARD: October 9, 2003 __________ Before WINTERS, LORIN and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-3, 5, 7-21, 23-26 and 28-30. Claims 22 and 27 are also pending in the application, but claim 27 has been allowed, and claim 22 is merely objected to as dependent on a rejected base claim. Claims 1, 18 and 20 are representative of the subject matter on appeal: 1. A patch comprising: a matrix having adhesive properties in a dry state and containing at least one active substance; said matrix being attached via one face to a porous backing and being for application via its other face to the skin; wherein said backing is capable of containing a liquid suitable for dissolving, at least in part, said at least one active substance; wherein said matrix is permeable to the liquid; and wherein said at least one active substance is not suitable for migrating through the matrix, toward the other face for application to the skin, without addition of said liquid to the patch. 18. A kit constituted by a patch as defined in claim 1, and a receptacle containing a liquid for impregnating said backing.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007