Ex Parte STILL et al - Page 1




                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                                                                                          Paper No. 45                     
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                      __________                                                           
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                      __________                                                           
                                              Ex parte W. CLARK STILL,                                                     
                                          GE LI, and HELMA WENNEMERS                                                       
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                 Appeal No. 2003-0998                                                      
                                              Application No. 08/676,143                                                   
                                                      __________                                                           
                                              HEARD November 20, 2003                                                      
                                                      __________                                                           
                  Before WINTERS, MILLS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
                  GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                         This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                            
                  final rejection of claims 25-33, 35, 36, 39, 42, 43, and 73-75.  Claims 68-71 are                        
                  also pending and have been indicated to be allowable if rewritten in independent                         
                  form.  See Paper No. 36, mailed Nov. 7, 2001, page 9.  Claim 25 is                                       
                  representative of the claims on appeal and reads as follows:                                             
                         25.    A library comprising a plurality of distinct synthetic receptors,                          
                                wherein each synthetic receptor comprises a template covalently                            
                                linked to two or more oligomers, said template chosen from the                             
                                group consisting of (a) monocyclic aliphatic hydrocarbons                                  
                                substituted with two or more groups to which oligomers are                                 
                                attached, (b) polycyclic aliphatic hydrocarbons substituted with two                       






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007