Ex Parte PORTER et al - Page 2



                Appeal No. 2003-1016                                                                                  Page 2                    
                Application No. 09/450,999                                                                                                      
                                                          The Cited Reference                                                                   
                         In rejecting applicants' claims on non-prior art grounds, the examiner cites the                                       
                following reference:                                                                                                            
                Hawley, The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, p. 25 (Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., NY                                                 
                1977)                                                                                                                           

                                                               The Rejection                                                                    
                         Claims 2 through 13, 15 through 17, and 19 through 22 stand rejected under                                             
                35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as indefinite.                                                                               


                                                               Deliberations                                                                    
                         Our deliberations in this matter have included evaluation and review of the                                            
                following materials: (1) the instant specification, including all of the claims on appeal;                                      
                (2) applicants' Appeal Brief (Paper No. 29) and the Reply Brief (Paper No. 31); (3) the                                         
                Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 30); and (4) the above-cited reference.                                                            
                         On consideration of the record, including the above-listed materials, we reverse                                       
                the examiner's rejection.                                                                                                       


                                                                 Discussion                                                                     
                         The examiner argues that claims 2 through 13, 15 through 17, and 19 through 22                                         
                are indefinite within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, in view of these                                        
                terms recited in independent claim 16: "cycloaliphatic;" "polycycloaliphatic;" and                                              
                "heteropolycycloaliphatic."  We disagree.                                                                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007