Appeal No. 2003-1147 Application No. 09/598,580 Claims 1 and 11 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and are produced below: 1. A method of controlling the supply of ink in a printing machine wherein the ink is differently guided zonally on an ink- fountain roller transversely to the printing direction, and is transferred by a vibrator roller to a distributor roller, which comprises metering the ink zonally for counteracting ink transfer disturbances caused by a stroke movement of the distributor roller, so as to minimize the disturbances automatically to at least an effective extent. 11. A method of controlling the supply of ink in a printing machine, which comprises: metering zonally differentiated ink on an ink-fountain roller transversely to a printing direction; transferring the ink by a vibrator roller to a distributor roller; and performing the step of zonally metering the ink to counteract ink transfer disturbances caused by a stroke movement of the distributor roller. The reference relied upon by the examiner is: Thünker et al. (Thünker) 5,701,817 Dec. 30, 1997 GROUND OF REJECTION Claims 1-3 and 11-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Thünker. We affirm. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007