The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte ERNST MICHAEL WINTER,
LOTHAR SCHAFER and THORSTEN MATTHEE
_______________
Appeal No. 2003-1200
Application No. 09/319,142
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the
examiner to allow claims 16-31 as amended subsequent to the final
rejection.1 The only other claim remaining in the application,
1 The file record for this application reflects that the amendment filed
February 12, 2002 (Paper No. 19) should be clerically entered. This entry
should be effected upon the return of the application to the Examining Corps.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007