The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WINFRIED ARZ and STEFAN STOCKER
_____________
Appeal No. 2003-1250
Application No. 09/388,582
______________
HEARD: OCTOBER 9, 2003
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2,
11 and 13. Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a
rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in
independent form including all of the limitations of the base
claim and any intervening claims.
The disclosed invention relates to a magnetic coil directly
cooled by a cooling tube that extends through an opening formed
by at least two profiled electrical conductor segments of a coil
winding.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007