Ex Parte CHEN et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1279                                                        
          Application 09/455,621                                                      



          if rewritten in independent form to include all of the limita-              
          tions of the base claims and any intervening claims.  See Appeal            
          Brief, Paper No. 10, received May 8, 2002, page 3.                          
                    Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on                
          appeal and is reproduced below:                                             
                    1.  A fiber optic connector module, comprising:                   
                    a ferrule terminated to at least one optical fiber, the           
          ferrule including a front mating end and a rear end;                        
                    a pin keeper engaged with the rear end of the ferrule;            
                    at least one alignment pin extending from the pin                 
          keeper through the ferrule and projecting beyond the front mating           
          end of the ferrule for operative association with a complementary           
          connecting device;                                                          
                    a pusher member spaced behind the pin keeper; and                 
                    a spring sandwiched between the pusher member and the             
          pin keeper, the spring having opposite ends fixed to the pusher             
          member and the pin keeper to hold the entire module together as a           
          self-contained unit.                                                        
                    The reference relied upon by the examiner is:                     
          Knight                  6,085,003                  July  4, 2000            
          (filed July 28, 1998)                                                       

                                GROUNDS OF REJECTION                                  
                    1.  Claims 1 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 102(e) as unpatentable over Knight.                                       


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007