Appeal No. 2003-1289 Page 8
Application No. 09/028,796
casket of Whitney for the same rationale as set forth above in our discussion of the
anticipation rejection based on Wible.
For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 22
to 24, 26 and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Whitney is affirmed.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 23 and 26 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Wible is affirmed and the decision of the
examiner to reject claims 22 to 24, 26 and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by Whitney is affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007