The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KEVIN R. ANDERSON and CHRISTOPHER J. MISORSKI ____________ Appeal No. 2003-1332 Application No. 09/797,143 ____________ HEARD: November 19, 2003 ____________ Before COHEN, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (Paper No. 11, mailed April 9, 2002) of claims 1 to 5 and 7 to 20, which are all of the claims pending in this application. In the brief (Paper No. 18, filed September 9, 2002), the appellants withdrew claims 1 to 5 and 7 to 14 from appeal. Accordingly, the appeal with respect to claims 1 to 5 and 7 to 14 is dismissed. Claims 15 to 20 remain on appeal. We REVERSE.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007