The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DENNIS E. OCHS and DANIEL J. POWERS ____________ Appeal No. 2003-1339 Application No. 09/810,813 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 21-24. Claims 25 and 26 stand objected to as containing allowable subject matter but depending from a rejected claim. Claims 1-20 and 39-58 have been canceled, and claims 27-38 have been withdrawn as being directed to a non-elected invention. We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007