Ex Parte Ochs et al - Page 1




                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was  not written               
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                                                                                             Paper No. 20             
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                    ____________                                                      
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                    ____________                                                      
                                Ex parte DENNIS E. OCHS and DANIEL J. POWERS                                          
                                                    ____________                                                      
                                                Appeal No. 2003-1339                                                  
                                              Application No. 09/810,813                                              
                                                    ____________                                                      
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                    ____________                                                      
             Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
             ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     



                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                    This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 21-24.                 
             Claims 25 and 26 stand objected to as containing allowable subject matter but                            
             depending from a rejected claim.  Claims 1-20 and 39-58 have been canceled, and                          
             claims 27-38 have been withdrawn as being directed to a non-elected invention.                           


                    We AFFIRM.                                                                                        









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007