Ex Parte Laats et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-1363                                                        
          Application No. 09/608,985                                                  

          respective copies of which appear in the APPENDIX to the brief              
          (Paper No. 11).                                                             

               As evidence of anticipation and obviousness, the examiner              
          has applied the documents listed below:                                     

          Miller                   1,100,389                Jun. 16, 1914             
          Wollman                  4,664,533                May  12, 1987             
               The following rejections are before us for review.                     

               Claims 1, 3 through 10, 12, and 16 through 19 stand rejected           
          under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (enablement).                        

               Claims 6 through 10, 16, 17, and 19 stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (description).                             

               Claims 1, 3 through 10, 12, and 16 through 19 stand rejected           
          under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph (indefiniteness).                   

               Claims 1, 3, 5 through 10, and 19 stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Miller.                          

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007