The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JUN KITAMURA
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1375
Application No. 09/035,425
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and LEVY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through
8.
The disclosed invention relates to iris control in a video
camera apparatus.
Claim 1 is the only independent claim on appeal, and it reads
as follows:
1. A video camera apparatus comprising:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007