Appeal No. 2003-1381
Application No. 09/577,427
criticality. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 276, 205 USPQ 215,
218-19 (CCPA 1980); In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ
233, 235 (CCPA 1955). Here, appellant’s have not met this
burden.
In view of the above, we affirm each of the art rejections.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)
AFFIRMED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)BOARD OF PATENT
) APPEALS AND
CATHERINE TIMM ) INTERFERENCES
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)
)
BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
BAP/sld
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007