Appeal No. 2003-1412 Application 10/017,543 169 USPQ 423, 426 ([CCPA] 1971); In re Crockett, . . . 279 F.2d 274, 276-77, 126 USPQ 186, 188 ([CCPA] 1960). As this court explained in Crockett, the idea of combining them flows logically from their having been individually taught in the prior art.”); In re Siebentritt, 372 F.2d 566, 567-68, 152 USPQ 618, 619 (CCPA 1967) (express suggestion to interchange methods which achieve the same or similar results is not necessary to establish obviousness). Reversed CHARLES F. WARREN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) PETER F. KRATZ ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) JAMES T. MOORE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) Hewlett-Packard Company Intellectual Property Administration P.O. Box 272400 - 6 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007