Ex Parte Neuer et al - Page 9



          Appeal No. 2003-1422                                                        
          Application 09/738,212                                                      


                    3.  Provisional rejection of claims 21-30 and 33                  
                    under the judicially created doctrine of obvious-                 
          type double patenting as being unpatentable                                 
                    over claims 1-30 of copending Application                         
                    No. 09/690,400                                                    
                    Application No. 09/690,400 issued as U.S. Patent                  
          No. 6,258,808 on July 10, 2001.  We have reviewed the claims of             
          the issued patent and have concluded that they are not directed             
          to the same invention claimed in present claims 21-30 and 33, and           
          do not render obvious claims 21-30 and 33.                                  
                    The rejection is reversed.                                        
                    4.  Provisional rejection of claims 21-30 and 33                  
                    under the judicially created doctrine of obvious-                 
          type double patenting as being unpatentable                                 
                    over claims 1 and 2 of copending Application                      
                    No. 09/605,512                                                    
                    Application No. 09/605,512 was abandoned on                       
          March 26, 2002.  Accordingly, we vacate this ground of rejection.           
                    5.  Provisional rejection of claims 21-30 and 33                  
                    under the judicially created doctrine of obvious-                 
          type double patenting as being unpatentable                                 
                    over claims 1-3, 5-8, 15, 17, 19, 24, 26                          
                    and 28 of copending Application No. 09/547,802                    
                    Appellants fail to present arguments traversing this              
          ground of rejection.  See Appeal Brief, page 4.  Accordingly,               
          the rejection is affirmed.                                                  

                                          9                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007