The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANSGAR ASPALTER, RICHARD BUDIN, KRZYSZTOF KROTLA,
CHRISTIAN LECHNER, ROBERT REITER and HELMUT WENZL
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1549
Application No. 09/356,400
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, LIEBERMAN, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 4 and 14 through 17,
which are all the claims pending in the above-identified
application.
Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and
reads as follows:
1. A method of introducing a second reaction medium into and
mixing the second reaction medium with a first reaction medium,
which comprises:
conducting a first reaction medium in a flow channel;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007