The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CLAUDE A. VIDAL, ALAN K. PLYLEY,
RUSSELL J. REDMOND and ROGER LAGERQUIST
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1568
Application No. 09/516,603
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 8, 9,
16, 17, 25 to 32 and 34.1 Claims 33 and 35 to 40 stand allowed. Claims 2 to 7, 14, 22
and 23 have been withdrawn from consideration. Claims 10 to 13, 15, 18 to 21 and 24
have been canceled.
We REVERSE.
1 Claim 25 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007