The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PATRICK KURZEJA, RONALD N. BRISSETTE, JIM HAWKINS,
CHRIS KEENEY, CHRISTOS KYRTSOS, JACK DARRIN OATES
and TOM SANKO
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1569
Application No. 09/783,466
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Patrick Kurzeja et al. originally took this appeal from the
final rejection (Paper No. 5) of claims 1, 2 and 5 through 12.1
As the appellants have since canceled claim 12, and amended
claims 1, 2 and 8, the appeal now involves claims 1, 2 and 5
through 11, all of the claims currently pending in the
application.
1 Through an apparent oversight, the examiner mistakenly
rejected canceled claims 3 and 4 in the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007