The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MILTON C. SHAW and AMITABH VYAS
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1657
Application No. 09/554,319
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's non-final rejection (Paper No.
10, mailed September 10, 2002) of claims 2 to 5, 7 to 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18 to 23, 25,
26, 29, 30 and 35. Claims 6, 10, 11, 17, 24, 27, 28 and 31, the only other claims
pending in this application, have been objected to as depending from a non-allowed
claim.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007