Ex Parte Telles - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2003-1705                                       Page 2          
         Application No. 09/904,058                                                 


                                     BACKGROUND                                     
              Appellant's invention relates to an annular sealing ring for          
         positioning between a toilet bowl and floor surface.  For a                
         further understanding of the invention, reference is made to               
         claim 7, which is reproduced below.                                        
                   7.  A generally planar annular sealing ring having               
              inner and outer diameters and adapted for positioning                 
              between a toilet bowel and a floor surface on which                   
              said toilet bowl rests, said annular sealing ring being               
              shaped in any effective toilet sealing ring                           
              configuration, said annular sealing ring comprising                   
              polyethylene foam characterized by resilience and the                 
              ability to recover substantially its original shape and               
              thickness after compression loading.                                  

              The prior art references of record relied upon by the                 
         examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                             
         Izzi, Sr. (Izzi)              4,482,161           Nov. 13, 1984            
         Quandt                        5,988,699           Nov. 23, 1999            
              Claims 7-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being          
         unpatentable over Izzi in view of Quandt.                                  
              We refer to the brief and reply brief and to the answer for           
         a complete exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed by              
         appellant and the examiner concerning the issues before us on              
         this appeal.                                                               










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007