Ex Parte BECHTOLD et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1751                                                        
          Application No. 09/179,357                                                  


          the claims on appeal.  Details of the appealed subject matter are           
          provided in illustrative claim 1, which is reproduced below:                
               1.  A device for providing ultrasonic therapy to a breast of           
               a patient, comprising:                                                 
               a container filled with at least one liquid for receiving a            
               breast of a patient;                                                   
               an acoustically transmitting fixing membrane disposed in               
               said container for mechanically fixing the breast of the               
               patient; and                                                           
               an ultrasonic transducer associated with said container,               
               said ultrasonic transducer emitting sound waves having a               
               principal emission direction forming with a plane of a body            
               of the patient an angle of less than or equal to 50o, said             
               emission direction to be altered for setting the focus of              
               said sound waves to any tissue region within the breast of             
               the patient.                                                           
               Claims 1 and 3 through 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 101 as being directed to non-statutory subject matter.                    
               We reverse.                                                            
               The examiner asserts (Answer, page 2):                                 
               The claimed invention is defined in terms of the body                  
               of a patient and therefore inferentially includes the                  
               patient as part of the claimed invention.  The                         
               inclusion of a patient in the claimed invention renders                
               the claimed subject matter non-statutory.                              
          We concur with the examiner to the extent that a human cannot be            
          either directly or indirectly claimed as part of an invention.              
          However, in this case, we find nothing in the claims on appeal or           
          the specification which indicates that a human part or a human is           

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007