The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MURRY L. NEAL and ALLAN D. BAIN ____________ Appeal No. 2003-1796 Application No. 09/513,563 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (Paper No. 13, mailed August 7, 2001) of claims 1, 5 to 10, 16 and 23 to 28. Claims 11 to 15, the only other claims pending in this application, have been withdrawn from consideration. We AFFIRM-IN-PART, however, for reasons explained infra, we have denominated our affirmance of the rejection of claim 8 a new ground of rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007