Ex Parte Taylor - Page 3




              Appeal No. 2003-1857                                                                  Page 3                
              Application No. 09/799,350                                                                                  


              that said hook portions are oriented in substantially the same direction when secured to                    
              the support wire.”  The examiner’s statement (final rejection, page 2 and answer, page                      
              3) that Swick is silent on the hook portions being rotated 180o is a mischaracterization.                   
              As illustrated in Figures 2 and 3, Swick’s clip portions 14 are not rotated 180o as called                  
              for in appellant’s claim 1.  In any event, the examiner recognizes that Swick provides no                   
              teaching of such orientation of the hook or clip portions but determines that                               
                            it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art                                
                            at the time of the invention to modify the teachings of Swick                                 
                            since the modification is merely a change in orientation to                                   
                            provide a tighter loop around the branch thus providing a                                     
                            more secure hold of the branch to the wire and does not                                       
                            present a patentably distinct limitation.  The modification to                                
                            the fastener of Swick performs the same intended function                                     
                            and is merely an alternate equivalent position.  The                                          
                            orientation of the hook portions do not affect the function of                                
                            the hook portions for securing the branch to the support                                      
                            wire.  One of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to                                 
                            modify the orientation since it is old and notoriously well-                                  
                            known to twist a flexible member to reduce the                                                
                            circumference of the securing area to create tighter and                                      
                            better hold.  Thus, the modification to Swick is merely an                                    
                            obvious reverse of the orientation without any additional                                     
                            modification to the function of the fastener [answer, pages 3-                                
                            4].                                                                                           
                     Even when obviousness is based on a single prior art reference, there must be a                      
              showing of a suggestion or motivation to modify the teachings of that reference.  The                       
              motivation, suggestion or teaching may come explicitly from statements in the prior art,                    
              the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art, or, in some cases, the nature of the                     
              problem to be solved.  In addition, the teaching, motivation, or suggestion may be                          







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007