Appeal No. 2003-1892 Application No. 09/681,288 Izu et al. (Izu) 4,332,880 Jun. 1, 1982 Barzynski 4,523,208 Jun. 11, 1985 Shinkai et al. (Shinkai) 5,368,988 Nov. 29, 1984 Nishida et al. (Nishida) 5,753,412 May 19, 1998 Rollhaus et al. (Rollhaus) 6,011,772 Jan. 4, 2000 Takagishi et al. (Takagishi) 6,168,844 Jan. 2, 2001 (Filed Aug. 3, 1998) Lawandy et al. (Lawandy) 6,338,933 Jan. 15, 2002 (Filed Jun. 24, 1999) Enmanji et al (Enmanji) JP 60-213938 Oct. 26, 1985 (Published Japanese patent application) The Examiner rejected claims 1 to 9, 20 to 23 and 26 to 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combination of Rollhaus and either one of Nishida, Shinkai or Takagishi; claims 1 to 9, 11 to 14, 20 to 23, 26 to 29, 31 and 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the over the combination of Rollhaus, Lawandy and either one of Nishida, Shinkai or Takagishi; claims 1 to 23 and 26 to 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the over the combination of Rollhaus, Lawandy and either one of Nishida, Shinkai or Takagishi, further combined with Enmanji and Barzynski; and claims 1 to 23 and 26 to 32 -4-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007