Ex Parte Renzi et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1960                                                        
          Application No. 09/830,841                                                  


          claim and any intervening claims (Answer, page 2, ¶(3)).                    
          Accordingly, the claims under rejection in this appeal are claims 1         
          through 26.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.              
               According to appellants, the invention is directed to                  
          a liquid composition which is polymerizable, by means of radical            
          polymerization with low shrinkage, into organic glasses,                    
          comprising the product obtained from the transesterification                
          of a diallylcarbonate (A) with a mixture of one or more linear or           
          branched aliphatic diols (B), containing from 3 to 10 carbon atoms          
          in the molecule, with a linear or branched aliphatic polyol (C),            
          containing from 4 to 20 carbon atoms in the molecule, where the             
          molar ratio (A)/(B+C) ranges from 2.5/1 to 4/1 and the quantity of          
          (C) in the mixture (B+C) ranges from 5% by weight to 20% by weight          
          with respect to the total weight of the mixture (Brief, page 2).  A         
          copy of representative independent claim 1 is attached as an                
          Appendix to this decision.                                                  
               The examiner relies upon Renzi et al. (Renzi), U.S. Patent No.         
          4,970,293, issued Nov. 13, 1990, as evidence to support the sole            
          rejection on appeal (Answer, page 3, ¶(9)).  Claims 1-26 stand              
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as “clearly anticipated” by Renzi         
          (Answer, page 3, with reference to the final rejection of Paper No.         
          7 for a statement of the rejection).  Since we determine that the           

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007