Appeal No. 2003-2056 Page 7
Application No. 09/377,442
Claim 13, which depends from claim 1 through claims 5 and 2, stands rejected
on the basis of Esposto and Miyasaka, taken further in view of Watt, which the
examiner applied for teaching coupling heat pipes to one another by means of a flange
type interface. Be that as it may, Watt does not alleviate the problems we pointed out
above regarding claim 1, and therefore this rejection is not sustained.
CONCLUSION
Neither rejection is sustained.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007