Ex Parte GOTZ - Page 11




                Appeal No. 2003-2134                                                                          Page 11                   
                Application No. 09/421,675                                                                                              


                Claim 9                                                                                                                 
                        Claim 9 is not readable on Szarkowski.  First, the framework construction of                                    
                Szarkowski does not form a triangle.  As shown in Figure 1, the framework construction                                  
                of Szarkowski (brace 41, upright member 40 and the rear part of side member 12) does                                    
                not form a triangle since brace 41 does not extend to the rear part of side member 12.                                  
                Second, the corner formed by upright member 40 and the rear part of side member 12                                      
                is not located in the vicinity of the bearing for the rear weight (i.e., very near the                                  
                overhead bridge construction 14).                                                                                       


                        Since claim 9 does not read on Szarkowski, the decision of the examiner to                                      
                reject claim 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed.                                                                    


                                                           CONCLUSION                                                                   
                        To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to 3, 5, 7 to 11 and                              
                19 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is affirmed and the decision of the examiner to reject claim                                
                9 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed.                                                                                 















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007