The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JYOJI MISHINA, YASUSHI MASUDA,
and RYOSUKE NAKANISHI
____________
Appeal No. 2003-2172
Application No. 09/644,793
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 16, all of the claims in the application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to an airbag. A basic
understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of
exemplary claims 1 and 14, respective copies of which appear at
the end of the main brief (Paper No. 13).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007