Ex Parte Copetti et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0022                                                           
          Application No. 09/734,807                                                     


               at least one contact hole (6) which passes through the                    
          module and                                                                     
               a structured metallization which covers the module and the                
          contact hole (6)                                                               
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                      
          evidence of obviousness:                                                       
          Lewis                              1,580,057          Apr.  6, 1926            
          Ohyama et al. (Ohyama)             4,437,140          Mar. 13, 1984            
          Guertin                            4,470,096          Sep.  4, 1984            
          Pedder                             5,604,658          Feb. 18, 1997            
          McMillan et al. (McMillan)         6,297,458          Oct.  2, 2001            
                                                              (Feb. 11, 1997)            
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a module having              
          a thin-film circuit on an insulating substrate.  The module                    
          includes a passive component having at least a first and second                
          electrically conducting layer and a dielectric layer, wherein at               
          least one of the conducting layers has a structured surface with               
          recesses.  The recesses "have the result that the passive                      
          component is composed of various capacitors connected in                       
          parallel," which result in the capacitance of the passive                      
          component being equal to the sum of the capacitance values of the              
          parallel capacitors (page 2 of Brief, last paragraph).                         
               Appealed claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                 
          being unpatentable over Ohyama in view Guertin.  Claims 2 and 3                
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                
          Ohyama in view of Guertin and Lewis, whereas claim 4 stands                    

                                          -2-                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007