The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte TOSHIKI YANAGI _____________ Appeal No. 2004-0071 Application No. 09/888,445 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before CAROFF, GARRIS, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claim 1. As acknowledged in appellant’s reply brief, claim 2, the only other claim in appellant’s application, stands withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to a non- elected invention and, thus, is not before us on appeal. Claim 1, the sole claim on appeal, is directed to a porous sheet substrate from which pieces are to be cut or removed. In order to facilitate later removal of the pieces from thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007