Ex Parte Yun - Page 5




              Appeal No. 2004-0096                                                               Page 5                
              Application No. 09/785,273                                                                               


              inside surface of the side of the water pail 20.  This detailed description of the invention             
              mentions nothing about the air passageway or bisection member being “detachable” or                      
              “detachably adhered” to the outlet.  Nevertheless, page 4 of appellant’s specification                   
              cites as one of the advantages of appellant’s invention that, “since the air passageway                  
              is detachably formed, it is possible to facilitate cleaning thereof.”  Accordingly, it is not            
              apparent from this written description how the air passageway or bisection member is                     
              secured on the container or whether or to what degree such securement is detachable                      
              and appellant’s drawing Figures 2a, 2b, 3 and 4 do nothing to clarify this point.3  While                
              the summary of the invention on page 2 of appellant’s brief states that the bisection                    
              member 31 “bisects the outlet and has a width equal to a dimension of the outlet such                    
              that the edges of the bisection member frictionally engage the outlet to adhere the                      
              bisection member to the outlet” and claim 3, which was not an original claim, contains a                 
              similar recitation, Figure 2b in appellant’s application appears to illustrate the bisection             
              member 31 having a width which is less than the diameter of the outlet and edges                         
              which meet the inner surface of the outlet 10 at points which are not diametrically                      
              opposed, thereby implying that frictional engagement of the bisection member with the                    
              outlet is not the means of adherence of the bisection member and air passageway to                       
              the container.                                                                                           



                     3 We also note that the reference numerals 31 and 32 appear to be reversed in Figure 4.           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007