The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte Steven E. Armington, Richard O. Ratzel,
Paul J. Guth and MacDonald C. Booze
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0116
Application No. 09/966,307
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 160 to
173 and 194 to 204, which are all of the claims pending in this application.1
We REVERSE.
1 Claim 160 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007