Ex Parte Armington et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         

                                                                                             Paper No. 18              

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        

                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                   Ex parte Steven E. Armington, Richard O. Ratzel,                                    
                                        Paul J. Guth and MacDonald C. Booze                                            
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                 Appeal No. 2004-0116                                                  
                                              Application No. 09/966,307                                               
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
              Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
              NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       



                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 160 to                 
              173 and 194 to 204, which are all of the claims pending in this application.1                            


                     We REVERSE.                                                                                       



                     1 Claim 160 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007