Ex Parte Rosasco et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          
                                                                                              Paper No. 15              
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                 Ex parte JAMES J. ROSASCO, DOUGLAS L. WITTE                                            
                                                 and PETER STURRUS                                                      
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                 Appeal No. 2004–0182                                                   
                                               Application No. 09/933,354                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
              Before ABRAMS, McQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
              ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      


                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 7, 9                 
              and 18-20.  Claims 11-15 have been allowed, claims 2-6, 8 and 10 have been indicated                      
              as containing allowable subject matter, and claims 16 and 17 have been canceled.                          


                     We REVERSE.                                                                                        











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007