The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES J. ROSASCO, DOUGLAS L. WITTE
and PETER STURRUS
____________
Appeal No. 2004–0182
Application No. 09/933,354
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, McQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 7, 9
and 18-20. Claims 11-15 have been allowed, claims 2-6, 8 and 10 have been indicated
as containing allowable subject matter, and claims 16 and 17 have been canceled.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007