Ex Parte Greene - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0217                                                        
          Application 09/824,544                                                      


          (specification, page 1).  Representative claim 1 reads as                   
          follows:                                                                    
               1.  A modular pallet comprising:                                       
               a top wall;                                                            
               a bottom wall;                                                         
               a guide channel defining portion configured for defining at            
          least one guide channel at least partially between the top wall             
          and the bottom wall;                                                        
               at least one opening in the bottom wall, wherein the opening           
          being adapted to receive a corresponding lift strap of a bulk bag           
          so that the lift strap defines a loop in the at least one guide             
          channel; and                                                                
               an insert member configured to be inserted into the at least           
          one guide channel for engaging the loop of a lift strap received            
          in the at least one opening to thereby fasten the bulk bag to the           
          modular pallet for forming a bulk bag combination, wherein the              
          insert member being configured for engagement by a lifting device           
          for lifting and maneuvering the bulk bag combination.                       
                                   THE REJECTION                                      
               Claims 1 through 6, 8 through 21, 23, 24 and 28 stand                  
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by U.S.              
          Patent No. 4,875,419 to Helton et al. (Helton).                             
               Attention is directed to the main and reply briefs (Paper              
          Nos. 17 and 19) and to the final rejection and answer (Paper Nos.           
          8 and 18) for the respective positions of the appellant and the             
          examiner regarding the merits of this rejection.                            
                                     DISCUSSION                                       
               Anticipation is established only when a single prior art               
          reference discloses, expressly or under principles of inherency,            
          each and every element of a claimed invention.  RCA Corp. v.                

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007