THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 64
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
NILES R. ROSENQUIST
Junior Party,1
v.
THOMAS SCHOLL and PETER BIER
Senior Party.2
_______________
Patent Interference No. 103,812
_______________
HEARD: November 12, 1998
Before METZ, SCHAFER and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINAL DECISION UNDER 37 CFR § 1.658(a)
This is a final decision under 37 CFR § 1.658(a) in Interference No. 103,812. The
interference involves U.S. Patent No. 5,523,379, granted June 4, 1996, to Niles R. Rosenquist
("Rosenquist") and Application 08/438,516, filed May 10, 1995, to Thomas Scholl and Peter
1U.S. Patent No. 5,523,379 granted June 4, 1996, based on Application 08/361,264 filed
December 21, 1994. Assigned to the General Electric Company, a corporation of New York.
2Application 08/438,516 filed May 10, 1995. Accorded the benefit of German patent
application P 4417748.8 filed May 20, 1994. Assigned to Bayer Aktiengesellschaft, Germany.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007