0
Interference No. 104,068
the count, but are not entitled to a patent containing their
claims 14-15 corresponding to the count.'
MARC L. CAROFF//
Administr tive P tent J d9e)
BOARD OF PATENT
)ZI --- ) APPEALS
ANDREW H. METZ AND
Administrative Patent d9e) INTERFERENCES
ADRIENE ýEPfANE HANLON
Administrative Patent Judge)
MLC/dal
Scott et al., claims 14-15 were found to be unpatentable
in the Decision on Motions (Paper No. 58). Scott et al. have not
sought review of that decision.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007