BARTZ et al v. MOORE, JR. et al - Page 6


               Interference No. 104,180                                                                                               

               met to discuss the progress made by the parties during Phase 3 of the project.  Alzeta disclosed                       
               the E burner to American at the May 1, 1993 meeting or shortly before the meeting.  It was                             
               disclosed to American that the burner had a diameter substantially equal to the inside diameter of                     
               the skirt of the water heater, that it had perforations over its entire face except for a narrow rim                   
               portion and that a venturi tube was to extend through the skirt for the injection of fuel gas and                      
               air.  American was unaware of the reasons or theory behind the use of a ceramic burner in                              
               combination with a lining of insulation to reduce NOx.  In the meeting, American disclosed to                          
               Alzeta a water heater design in which a metal screen burner was used in a 50-gallon water heater.                      
               The bottom of the American water heater was used as a plenum.  However, American was                                   
               having problems with the metal screen burner overheating the water heater skirt wall, and                              
               expressed a desire to keep the edge temperature of the burner below 350°F so that inexpensive                          
               insulation could be used around the outside of the skirt portion of the water heater.                                  
                                                       The Position of Bartz                                                          
                       Bartz argues that the testimony and corroborating documents establish that it conceived                        
               the invention of the count and that the senior party derived the critical elements from disclosures                    
               made by Alzeta at the meeting of May 1, 1993.  It is urged that if the senior party contributed any                    
               elements, those elements were obvious in view of the elements communicated to the senior party                         
               by Bartz, and do not entitle the senior party to claim inventorship.  The junior party submits that                    
               it is the inventor of a radiant gas burner in the form of a circular perforated ceramic flat plate, the                
               ceramic flat plate having a diameter substantially equal to the inside diameter of a water heater                      
               skirt and having perforations over its entire face except for a narrow rim portion.                                    
                       Bartz contends that the count can be divided into seven elements, as shown in BX-J2.                           
               The count, as divided by Bartz in the above exhibit, reads as follows:                                                 


                                                                 -6-                                                                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007